THE CREATIVE ATHLETE

Issue 35 -- What Is Sponsorship?

Sponsorship is money given to an athlete to underwrite training and living expenses. Being sponsored is the way many full-time athletes survive in sports that don't pay salaries or offer serious prize money.

The term sponsorship is a broad one which covers a range of financial arrangements:

1. Private sponsors.
Sometimes when athletes say they have sponsors, they mean wealthy fans who provide some or all of their financial support. There is usually no business arrangement between them. Most sponsors become involved because they want to help out promising athletes, not because they expect a tangible return. Their payback is the sense of satisfaction they receive by contributing to an athlete's success.

Until 1988 Olympic athletes were very limited in the amount of money they could earn. They could not accept endorsement, prize, or appearance money nor could they sell their services as corporate spokespersons, professional competitors, or coaches. This meant they were limited to funds they could earn from outside jobs, collect from family members, or solicit from boosters.

There are many more opportunities for athletes to earn money now, but private sponsorship still plays a role. It continues to subsidize young athletes in sports which are not underwritten by schools, community recreation programs, or private clubs. For example, figure skating is so prohibitively expensive that many skaters have depended upon help from private sponsors. Coming up with the $20,000 to $50,000 it takes each year to pay for a skater's expenses is simply impossible for most families. Examples of private sponsorship:

"We had women from New Zealand, France, Canada, Sweden and the United States. We had several Olympians and a world champion on the team." (4)

It should be pointed out here, however, that money should not blind an athlete to an unhealthy situation. One highly publicized example:

In 1996 he shot and killed one of the wrestlers he sponsored, Dave Schultz, who lived with his family on du Pont's property. Schultz had been there since 1988, served as a coach, and earned at least $75.000 a year.

Du Pont was known for erratic, even threatening, behavior, but he was tolerated, some say, because he had become such an important source of funding in a sport often cash-poor. There were, however, those in the wrestling community, such as University of Iowa coach Dan Gable, who warned athletes not to live there.

Another warning: depending on how the deal is structured, sponsorship can result in loss of amateur status. Increasingly young tennis players and their families are approached by backers who want to fund them in exchange for a percentage of future earnings. Two examples:

After an appeal to the NCAA in 1994, including a statement from a sports psychologist who said Cole's father forced her to turn pro, Cole was ruled eligible for a scholarship (although she would have to sit out her freshman year).

Said Ernie Griffin, the NCAA faculty representative for San Diego State, the university which filed the appeal on Cole's behalf, "I think the (NCAA) staff did exactly what it should have done. They are not the ones to set a precedent. But the eligibility committee can set a precedent, and it did. In this case . . . I'm quite sure it was because of the age that the individual turned pro.

"We argued that an individual of that age -- given the intellectual ability -- can't be expected to know exactly what is happening. To hold them responsible for those decisions seems a little harsh." (6)

"I coached Carlo for 18 months and was never paid a cent. [The sponsor] wrote me three checks and they all bounced."

Sarmiento's father added, "His sponsor told us he didn't have time for school with all the travel. He promised me he'd get Carlo a tutor, but he never did." George Sarmiento said other offers had come in for Carlo but they couldn't take them because of the contract, which they were trying to break. (7)

By 1995, Sarmiento had quit competitive tennis.

2. Corporate sponsors.
Professional athletes competing in non-salaried sports usually have most of their training expenses underwritten this way.

Corporate sponsorship and endorsement deals are similar arrangements. In both cases athletes receive money and the companies who pay the athletes receive publicity. The difference is that sponsorship implies the company is helping to cover training expenses, while endorsement does not. In other words, sponsorship suggests that the company and the athlete are, at some level, a team; endorsement suggests that the athlete is a company spokesperson or a business representative. Of the two arrangements, the endorsement deal is the more prestigious. A company might sponsor many promising athletes, but only hire one or two of the more famous ones as spokespersons. Examples:

3. Team ownership.
In some sports, most notably professional cycling, corporations sponsor entire teams rather than individual athletes. The team competes under the corporate logo. This type of sponsorship closely resembles an employer-employee relationship where athletes are in essence being paid salaries.

Some corporations sponsor athletes in sports which have no direct connection to their products (e.g., Seven-Eleven and Motorola have both sponsored cycling teams) and others sponsor teams they have created specifically to promote their products (e.g., Rollerblade has an inline skating team).

Team sponsorship can be a very expensive proposition. Two examples:

Some other team sponsorship examples:

Teams should be aware, however, that sometimes they are required to sign non-compete agreements which may hamper future sponsorship deals. When Coors ended its six-year sponsorship of the Coors Light Cycling team, a non-compete clause prevented the team director from entering into a sponsorship agreement with another brewery for a year. (17)

 
1 (Minneapolis) Star Tribune, February 2, 1992.
2 The Wall Street Journal, August 24, 1993.
3 Los Angeles Times, February 26, 1996.
4 The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, February 11, 1997.
5 (Minneapolis) Star Tribune, December 6, 1996; Chicago Tribune, May 4, 1997.
6 Los Angeles Times, October 23, 1994.
7 Los Angeles Times, June 21, 1994.
8 The Indianapolis Star, February 27, 1995.
9 USA Today, August 1, 1995.
10 The San Diego Union-Tribune, May 31, 1992.
11 The New York Times, July 27, 1991.
12 Outside, July 1995.
13 The Wall Street Journal, August 24, 1993.
14 The Denver Post, June 20, 1992.
15 Runner's World, September 1995.
16 Los Angeles Times, September 4, 1997.
17 The Denver Post, September 8, 1994.
 
Copyright 1998 Suzanne Lainson/SportsTrust


Home | Newsletter List | Next Issue