THE CREATIVE ATHLETE

Issue 23 -- The Coach: What to Expect

It should be fairly obvious to most people that all coaches do not coach alike and that what works for one athlete might not work for another. But it might be helpful at this time to discuss some of the pros and cons of different coaching styles.

1. Substitute parent.

Many coaches of younger athletes find themselves playing this role whether they like it or not. Sometimes an athlete doesn't have enough guidance at home and needs a father or mother figure to fill in the gaps. At other times it can be simply a matter of age differences--an older coach and a younger athlete falling into parent/child roles. Examples:

Coach/athlete relationships like this can be very nurturing and supportive. They usually work as long as the athlete is young and his or her real parents either approve or don't care.

But they don't work when a) the coach and the parents find themselves battling for control of the athlete or b) the athlete is too old or independent to be parented any longer.

2. Manager.

The manager coach is as involved in the athlete's life as the substitute parent coach is, but the relationship is more businesslike. Just like the substitute parent coach, the manager coach may closely monitor athletes on and off the field, and oversee virtually every detail of their lives. But there is an important difference in the relationship: the manager coach expects respect (based on his or her professional wisdom and experience) rather than love. Examples:

This coach/athlete relationship works well when the athlete is emotionally stable, but competitively and professionally inexperienced and knows it. The coach is in command and the athlete accepts this because he or she is eager to learn.

It doesn't work as well for an experienced athlete unless he or she hits a slump and wants to be completely remade.

3. Director.

This coach is less involved in an athlete's private life. He or she wants to be listened to when it comes to training and competition, but doesn't want to be bothered after hours. It is a working relationship rather than a personal one. Most likely the coach is older, is secure in his or her job, and is well-established in the community. The coach has a life outside of sports and doesn't need or want the companionship of his or her athletes. Examples:

"... Out of a sense of protection, I made myself hard. I knew I was in a hard business." After his marriage ended in divorce, he realized he needed a life apart from hockey. "I didn't put the time or energy into my personal life that I put into my professional life. I want more balance. It's absolutely paramount for my health." (9)

Because this type of coach can sometimes seem distant, he or she is not a good choice for an insecure athlete of any age. Probably the only type of athlete who would do well with this type of coach is someone who is emotionally self-reliant (not a quality found in most athletes) and at the same time has great respect for the coach's expertise.

4. Companion.

This coach hardly coaches at all. He or she is more of an observer/friend. In this relationship, it is the athlete who is making most of the decisions and the coach is there primarily to serve as a familiar, supportive audience. Examples:

"There are, however, two people I have a close relationship with--Peter Bentley, friend and coach, and Rod Carr, the Olympic yachting manager. I tend to discuss everything with them--good and bad." (11)

"I don't accept constructive criticism very well--except from Linda. I accept it from her because I know she has absolute faith in me, that whatever she asks me to do, it's in my best interests." (13)

This type of relationship rarely happens overnight. It usually starts out as a more traditional coach/athlete relationship, but evolves over time as the athlete reaches his or her peak and no longer needs formal instruction. By this time, the athlete knows as much about the sport and his or her abilities as the coach, but he or she still values the psychological bond between them.

It is a rare relationship because most coaches do not know when to step back and let the athlete take over. In addition, many athletes never develop emotionally to the point where they begin to make their own decisions. But it can be one of the best kinds of coach/athlete relationships because there is mutual respect and appreciation along with professional and psychological growth.

 
1 Denver Post, October 2, 1994.
2 The Dallas Morning News, July 14, 1996.
3 The Orange County Register, November 7, 1993.
4 CBS "Sports Show," December 16, 1995.
5 The Washington Post, December 07, 1997.
6 Steven Ungerleider. Quest for Success. (Waco, Texas: WRS Publishing), 1995.
7 Austin American-Statesman, November 25, 1997.
8 Michael Johnson. Slaying the Dragon. (New York: HarperCollins, 1996).
9 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 17, 1996.
10 The New York Times, May 23, 1993.
11 The Scotsman, August 22, 1994.
12 Los Angeles Times, February 13, 1994.
13 The Wall Street Journal, December 29, 1987.
14 The Idaho Statesman, August 21, 1997.
 
Copyright 1997 Suzanne Lainson/SportsTrust


Home | Newsletter List | Next Issue